Latest in Employment Law>Case Law>An Employee v A Tool Hire Company [2019]
An Employee v A Tool Hire Company [2019]
Published on: 16/05/2019
Issues Covered: Dismissal Pay
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Legal Island
Legal Island
{}
Background

This case focuses on the importance of bringing a claim of unfair dismissal within the requisite time frame. The Complainant was employed by the Respondent company from the 14th of October 2013 to the 5th of December 2017 when he resigned. He did not submit his claims under the Unfair Dismissals Act and the Terms of Employment (Information) Act until the 6th of September 2018. This, the Respondent argued, was outside the time frame (6 months which may be extended to 12 months in exceptional circumstances) that was outlined in the Acts and therefore should not be upheld.

The Complainant had chosen to represent himself at the hearing. In his submission, he maintained that he had legitimate reasons to explain why he did not submit his claims within the time limit. There was the issue of his stepdaughter’s father passing away which was closely followed by another death in the family.

A short time afterwards, his stepdaughter was hospitalised due to a misuse in medication. The Complainant was then hospitalised himself as he required treatment. Additionally, there had been a leak which allegedly destroyed half of the Complainant’s house.

In reaching its decision, the Adjudication Officer noted the unfortunate chain of events which took place after the Complainant had resigned and acknowledged how they could have a detrimental effect on the Complainant’s ability to manage his responsibilities.

However, it was established that the Complainant had in fact made contact with his employer approximately one week after offering his resignation to obtain records in order to claim benefits from the Department of Employment Affairs and Social Protection. Crucially, the Complainant had “failed to establish a causal connection between the factors relied upon by him and the delay in presenting the within claim”. Therefore, the court held that the Complainant’s claims were out of date and statute barred.
https://www.workplacerelations.ie/en/cases/2019/april/adj-00016633.html

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 16/05/2019
Legal Island’s LMS, licensed to you Imagine your staff having 24/7 access to a centralised training platform, tailored to your organisation’s brand and staff training needs, with unlimited users. Learn more →