Latest in Employment Law>Case Law>Claire Keenan v Stephen Kehoe t/a Mortgage Cabin [2012]
Claire Keenan v Stephen Kehoe t/a Mortgage Cabin [2012]
Published on: 08/11/2012
Issues Covered: Dismissal Discrimination Pay
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Legal Island
Legal Island
{}
Background

This is another ‘protected period’ case, involving selection of a pregnant worker for redundancy. In this case, the respondent employer did not appear at the hearing although he did make written submissions to the Tribunal.

The complainant worked for the employer from February 2005 until she was made redundant in June 2008. She announced that she was pregnant in December 2007 and, according to evidence accepted by the Tribunal, she was pressurised into taking a two month period of maternity leave and agreeing to work from home during the leave period. A male colleague was employed from May 2008 to help with the workload and the Tribunal accepted that he was doing broadly similar work to the complainant, at a more junior level. Apparent financial difficulties in the company resulted in the complainant’s redundancy on 15 June 2008.

The Tribunal once again emphasised the special status of the protected period for pregnant workers, including the entire period of pregnancy and maternity leave, as set out in the Labour Court decision in Trailercare Holdings -v- Healy (EDA128, 16 March 2012). The burden of proof was therefore on the respondent to show that the dismissal was not connected to the pregnancy and he had failed to do so. He had argued that the choice was between himself and the complainant but the Tribunal accepted that the choice was between the complainant and her recently appointed male colleague.

The complainant also attempted to raise a victimisation issue in that she claimed that the respondent refused to pay her holiday and some commission unless she agreed a full settlement with him. However the Tribunal concluded that this issue was not mentioned in the original complaint and was only raised over a year after the original complaint and therefore could not be addressed by the Tribunal.

She was awarded €95,000 (being the approximate equivalent of twelve month's remuneration) in respect of the discrimination.


http://www.equalitytribunal.ie/Database-of-Decisions/2012/Employment-Equality-Decisions/DEC-E2012-105-Full-Case-Report.html 

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 08/11/2012
Q&A
Legal Island’s LMS, licensed to you Imagine your staff having 24/7 access to a centralised training platform, tailored to your organisation’s brand and staff training needs, with unlimited users. Learn more →