An Employee v An Employer [2011]
Published on: 30/08/2011
Article Authors
The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Legal Island
{}
Background
The respondent operates a restaurant called "Admiral". Neither the respondent nor its representative attended the hearing, which concerned an ethnic Russian with Latvian nationality, who claimed discrimination on grounds of race and sex. The race claimed were dismissed but, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, her claims that her hours were cut and employment later terminated due to her pregnancy were accepted by the EO. The complainant was awarded over €14k compensation.
Continue reading
We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.
Already a subscriber?
Please log in to view the full article.
What you'll get:
- Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
- Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
- 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
- Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team
Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial
Disclaimer
The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.
This article is correct at 30/08/2011
Recent Case Law
Soniya George v Talbot Group [2024]
21/01/2025
An Employee v An Employer [2024]
16/01/2025
Roberta Girinelli -v- Genius Limited
09/01/2025
Q&A
How to handle it
Legal Island’s LMS, licensed to you
Imagine your staff having 24/7 access to a centralised training platform, tailored to your organisation’s brand and staff training needs, with unlimited users.
Learn more →
