A Commis Chef v A Restaurant [2023]
Decision Number: ADJ-00047333
Published on: 04/01/2024
Issues Covered:
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Paul D Maier BL Barrister
Paul D Maier BL Barrister
Paul maier

Paul D Maier is a barrister specialising in the law of work, labour, and employment. Based in Dublin, Ireland, he is a member of the Law Library, having been called to the Bar in 2022.

Paul represents both employers and employees at all levels of the Courts, as well as before the Labour Court and the Workplace Relations Commission. He is a qualified arbitrator and is frequently commissioned to lead independent investigations and disciplinary procedures for organisations. Additionally, he is regularly engaged to provide legal advice and opinions on employment law and related matters.

Paul serves as the Editor of the Irish Employment Law Journal and Employment Law Report, and he is the Treasurer of the Employment Bar Association.

Background

Background:

The Complainant worked for the Respondent from 15 November 2022 to 19 June 2023. On 21 August 2023 the Complainant submitted a complaint to the WRC under the Terms of Notice (Information) Act 1994, alleging he was not provided a statement of his terms of employment in writing. The Respondent accepted this failure and said in evidence that all of its employees hold such a statement, but one was not provided to the Complainant due to an administrative oversight related to the Complainant’s manager being on maternity leave. The Responded said that it has reviewed its policies and contracts of employment to ensure this type of mistake would not be made again.

A dispute arose between the parties as to the Complainant’s “weekly rate of pay” for the purpose of calculating compensation. This was addressed by the Respondent providing payslips which showed the pay provided to the Complainant for the period of his employment.

Outcome:

The Adjudication Officer noted that the Respondent’s Director and Manager gave evidence on behalf of the Respondent, and that “they both presented as honest and credible witnesses.” After finding that the Complainant’s weekly wage was €247, the Adjudication Officer found the complaint to be well-founded and directed the Respondent to make payment of one week’s wages to the Complainant.

Practical Guidance for Employers:

When an employer is found to be in breach of a statutory obligation, showing an Adjudication Officer respect for that obligation and attempts to ensure it does not happen again can greatly mitigate the potential award of compensation which may be directed.

The full case is here:
https://www.workplacerelations.ie/en/cases/2023/december/adj-00047333.html

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 04/01/2024
Legal Island’s LMS, licensed to you Imagine your staff having 24/7 access to a centralised training platform, tailored to your organisation’s brand and staff training needs, with unlimited users. Learn more →