Anthony Cosgrave v John Tinnelly & Sons (Ireland) Limited [2025]
Decision Number: ADJ-00056897 Legal Body: Workplace Relations Commission
Published on: 14/08/2025
Issues Covered:
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Patrick Barrett BL Barrister-at-Law
Patrick Barrett BL Barrister-at-Law
Patrick barrett case reviews

The Bar of Ireland

Orchard Way, Killarney V93Y9W9.
DX: 51010 Killarney 
Tel: (087) 4361270

Patrick's legal education is robust, beginning with a BCL Law Degree from University College Cork (2012-2016), followed by an LL.M in Business Law from the same institution (2016-2017), and culminating in a Barrister-at-Law Degree from The Honorable Society of King’s Inns in Dublin (2019-2021). He has extensive experience on the South-West Circuit, handling Civil, Family, and Criminal Law cases, as well as advising the Citizen Advice Service.  He has worked as an employment consultant, dealing with workplace investigations and bankruptcy procedures.

Complainant:
Anthony Cosgrave
Respondent:
John Tinnelly & Sons (Ireland) Limited
Summary

The employer was ordered to pay the higher Grade B SEO rate after a truck driver’s demolition site work was found to fall within the construction sector classification.

Background

The Complainant contended that he was employed in the construction sector as a truck driver, hauling debris and materials from building sites, and had always been paid at or above the Sectoral Employment Order (SEO) rate for Grade B general operatives. When the SEO hourly rate increased to €20.03 in August 2024, the Respondent refused to apply it, claiming truck drivers were not covered. The Complainant argued his duties fell within the Grade B definition in the 2017 SEO, which specifically included certain truck drivers, and that past practice and industry precedents supported this view. He claimed the refusal breached the SEO and reduced his pay by approximately €1,000 annually.

The Respondent submitted that the Complainant worked as a lorry driver hauling segregated waste and scrap metal to waste facilities, mostly operating a skip lorry under the waste collection permit. In August 2024, the Respondent reviewed market pay rates for lorry drivers (€16 to €17/hour) and found the Complainant was paid above that. They argued that being in the CIF pension scheme did not make the Complainant a construction worker and that the 2017 SEO did not classify lorry drivers as Grade B general operatives. He noted that the SEO omitted certain terms and maintained that the Complainant performed no site-based general operative duties, with 60% of company turnover from waste management, not construction.

Outcome

The Adjudicating Officer found that the Respondent operated in the construction sector as defined by the 2019 Sectoral Employment Order (SEO), given its involvement in demolition work. Although 60% of turnover came from waste management, demolition was integral to the business. The Complainant, originally hired in 2013 as a general operative at the new entrant rate and later moving to Grade C (now merged with Grade B), worked as a truck driver removing demolition waste from building sites (i.e. an activity considered intrinsic to demolition). They determined that truck drivers had historically been included in Category B or C under the 2011 REA and saw no evidence that the SEO intended to exclude them. As no policy change or negotiation had removed drivers from Category B, the Complainant was entitled to that rate.

Practical Guidance

Employers should ensure that all roles are accurately classified under the relevant Sectoral Employment Order (SEO) and that pay rates comply with the latest rates. Where a role, such as a truck driver, has historically been included in a category (e.g., Category B), clear documentary evidence and updated agreements are essential if seeking to exclude it from that classification. Regularly review SEO updates, assess their applicability to all employees, and maintain communication with staff regarding pay adjustments. Where the SEO definitions are broad, employers should obtain advice before making pay decisions that could result in disputes. Also, employers should keep records of pay history, job descriptions, and policy changes. This is vital in defending claims and reducing the risk of retrospective pay awards.


The full case can be found here.

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 14/08/2025
Conducting Workplace Investigations and Alternative Conflict Resolution Methods
Online
Discipline
Grievance and Dispute Resolution
Popular
Events
Phishing Awareness at Work
All Staff
Data Protection and GDPR
Popular
eLearning Course
Legal Island’s LMS, licensed to you Imagine your staff having 24/7 access to a centralised training platform, tailored to your organisation’s brand and staff training needs, with unlimited users. Learn more →