McCallister v Ballyglen Office Supplies Ltd (2025)
Decision Number: 123456 Legal Body: Other
Published on: 01/04/2026
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Summary

In this recent decision, an Employment Tribunal considered whether the removal of a communal biscuit tin constituted a breach of mutual trust and confidence, ultimately leading to a claim of constructive dismissal.

Background

Mr Declan McCallister, a long-serving accounts administrator with 11 years’ service, resigned following what he described as a “sustained erosion of workplace morale”. Central to his claim was management’s decision to replace the long-standing, unwritten “Friday Biscuit Rotation Policy” with a discretionary system controlled by senior staff.

Historically, employees took turns bringing in biscuits every Friday, fostering what the claimant described as a “critical cultural cornerstone”. However, following a cost-saving review, management introduced a locked biscuit tin, access to which required prior approval from a line manager and completion of a “Refreshment Justification Form”.

Matters escalated when Mr McCallister’s request for two chocolate digestives at 3:45pm was refused on the basis that he had “already consumed one custard cream earlier that day”.

Outcome

The Tribunal found, somewhat reluctantly, that while biscuits do not ordinarily form part of contractual terms, the longevity and consistency of the practice elevated it to an implied term of employment.

However, the claim ultimately failed. The Tribunal held that:

  • The employer’s actions, while “deeply unpopular”, did not reach the threshold required for constructive dismissal
  • The refusal of a second biscuit, though “regrettable”, was not sufficient to destroy mutual trust and confidence


That said, the Tribunal did note that the introduction of the “Refreshment Justification Form” was “ill-advised” and “arguably excessive in both scope and tone”.

Practical Guidance

Long-standing workplace customs, even informal ones, can carry legal risk if altered without consultation

  • Minor perks may have disproportionate cultural significance
  • Overly complex administrative controls (particularly relating to snacks) may undermine employee relations


Before implementing changes to workplace perks, HR teams may wish to conduct a “biscuit impact assessment” to evaluate potential fallout.


This case review is provided for light-hearted purposes in recognition of 1 April and should not be relied upon as legal advice. 

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 01/04/2026
Tackling Sensitive Workplace Conversations
HR Professional
Popular
eLearning Course
Managing Performance
HR Professional
Popular
eLearning Course
Discover the smarter way to deliver staff training (without the stress)! Streamline your company-wide training, enhance your staff's skills, and in increase productivity with our learning management system, AppLI LMS