Paul Lingard v Randridge International Ltd (In Examinership)
Decision Number: ADJ-00053934 Legal Body: Workplace Relations Commission
Published on: 28/04/2026
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Duncan Inverarity Employment Mediator (CEDR Accredited) and Investigator
Duncan Inverarity Employment Mediator (CEDR Accredited) and Investigator
Duncan inverarity 100x100

Duncan Inverarity is a former a partner and Head of A&L Goodbody's Employment Law group and practiced exclusively in the area of employment law and industrial relations in multiple jurisdictions. Duncan advised public and private sector employers on both contentious and non-contentious matters. He advised Board rooms across Ireland and abroad on strategic and complex employment and industrial relations matters. Duncan also specialised in crisis management for clients and advised on some of the most high profile corporate issues in Ireland. Duncan regularly appeared for clients in the Workplace Relations Commission, the Circuit Court, the High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court. Duncan also acted for partnerships in mediated settlements and in proceedings in the High Court.

Duncan now works as an Employment Mediator (CEDR Accredited)  and Investigator. 

Complainant:
Paul Lingard
Respondent:
Randridge International Ltd (In Examinership)
Summary

The WRC held that, despite a corporate contract, the reality of the working relationship showed employee status, emphasising control, limited substitution and the factual day-to-day arrangements between the parties.

Background

The case centred on whether Mr Lingard was an employee or an independent contractor even though the documented contractual relationship was between Mr Lingard’s private limited company, PSL (Aberdeen) Ltd (PSL) and Randridge (the Contract).

The Complainant accepted that when the Contract was entered into, his company had simply been retained to provide his services as an independent contractor. However, he claimed the relationship morphed over time and at the time the Contract terminated, he had become an employee of Randridge.

Randridge maintained the Complainant could not be deemed

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 28/04/2026
Discover the smarter way to deliver staff training (without the stress)! Streamline your company-wide training, enhance your staff's skills, and in increase productivity with our learning management system, AppLI LMS