A Worker v An Employer [2025]
Decision Number: IR - SC – 00003403 Legal Body: Workplace Relations Commission
Published on: 14/08/2025
Issues Covered:
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Patrick Barrett BL Barrister-at-Law
Patrick Barrett BL Barrister-at-Law
Patrick barrett case reviews

The Bar of Ireland

Orchard Way, Killarney V93Y9W9.
DX: 51010 Killarney 
Tel: (087) 4361270

Patrick's legal education is robust, beginning with a BCL Law Degree from University College Cork (2012-2016), followed by an LL.M in Business Law from the same institution (2016-2017), and culminating in a Barrister-at-Law Degree from The Honorable Society of King’s Inns in Dublin (2019-2021). He has extensive experience on the South-West Circuit, handling Civil, Family, and Criminal Law cases, as well as advising the Citizen Advice Service.  He has worked as an employment consultant, dealing with workplace investigations and bankruptcy procedures.

Complainant:
A Worker
Respondent:
An Employer
Summary

Employers must ensure investigations are policy-compliant.

Background

The Complainant alleged that the bullying complaints he lodged against his supervisor in late 2019 were mishandled and unnecessarily delayed. The process, involving investigation, appeal, re-investigation, and re-appeal, only concluded in April 2024. His representative argued that the agreed policy timelines had been breached and the handling was unprofessional, causing significant delay. It was submitted that these delays and poor management of the complaints had caused the Complainant inconvenience and distress, for which compensation was sought. The Complainant maintained that the prolonged process had undermined the integrity of the investigation and exacerbated the impact of the alleged bullying. The Respondent argued that the policy was followed, ensuring due process for both parties. While acknowledging some delays, they noted the Complainant suffered no loss of earnings.

Outcome

The Adjudicating Officer considered submissions and examined whether the Respondent’s Anti-Bullying and Harassment Policy and the Code of Practice were followed in handling the Complainant’s 2019 bullying complaints, concluded in April 2024. The first investigation was found flawed on appeal, and the second was overturned (revealing insufficient training of investigators). Key policy provisions, including handling non-cooperation and limits on legal representation, were breached. Significant delays occurred, including a ten-month pause for legal advice and three months to request appeal submissions. These breaches caused distress and inconvenience to the Complainant. The Adjudicator found no evidence the Complainant caused delays and recommended €7,500 compensation.

Practical Guidance

Employers should:

  • Strictly adhere to their own workplace policies and any relevant statutory / code-based procedures when investigating complaints. Policies should be clear, accessible, and consistently applied. Any deviation, e.g. permitting forms of representation not allowed under the policy, risks undermining the process and can be relied upon to challenge outcomes.
     
  • Investigators and/or appeal officers should receive specific training on handling workplace bullying or harassment complaints. This includes understanding procedural fairness, evidence, and decision-writing. Inconsistent / overturned findings signal insufficient preparation.
     
  • Protracted investigations erode trust and cause unnecessary stress. Employers should set realistic timelines and actively manage the process to prevent avoidable pauses (such as lengthy waits for legal advice or delayed requests for submissions). 
     
  • Ensure that policies include, and apply, provisions allowing investigations to proceed if a party fails to cooperate. Delays caused by non-participation must be addressed swiftly, thus ensuring the process continues fairly while respecting each party’s rights. This avoids giving one side effective control over the pace of proceedings.
     
  • Appreciate that even without loss of earnings, delays and mishandling can result in compensation awards for distress and inconvenience. Employers should view timely investigations not only as a legal obligation but also as a means to reduce exposure to financial and/or reputational risks.


The full case can be found here.

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 14/08/2025
Practical Skills for Confronting & Preventing Conflict at Work
Online
Employee Engagement
Grievance and Dispute Resolution
Personal Development
Performance
Popular
Events
Workplace Bullying
All Staff
Popular
eLearning Course
Workplace Harassment and Sexual Harassment
HR Professional All Staff
Popular
eLearning Course
Legal Island’s LMS, licensed to you Imagine your staff having 24/7 access to a centralised training platform, tailored to your organisation’s brand and staff training needs, with unlimited users. Learn more →