Latest in Employment Law>Case Law>Dienifer Taylor v Microchip Technology Ireland Limited [2024]
Dienifer Taylor v Microchip Technology Ireland Limited [2024]
Published on: 04/12/2024
Issues Covered: Remote and Hybrid Working
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Patrick Barrett BL Barrister-at-Law
Patrick Barrett BL Barrister-at-Law

The Bar of Ireland

Orchard Way, Killarney V93Y9W9.
DX: 51010 Killarney 
Tel: (087) 4361270

Patrick's legal education is robust, beginning with a BCL Law Degree from University College Cork (2012-2016), followed by an LL.M in Business Law from the same institution (2016-2017), and culminating in a Barrister-at-Law Degree from The Honorable Society of King’s Inns in Dublin (2019-2021). He has extensive experience on the South-West Circuit, handling Civil, Family, and Criminal Law cases, as well as advising the Citizen Advice Service.  He has worked as an employment consultant, dealing with workplace investigations and bankruptcy procedures.

Background

Background: 

The Complainant sought to reduce her workweek to three days due to the strain of a 150KM daily commute. In January, after her line manager dismissed her request, she sought advice from the WRC. Lacking clarity about her rights, she applied for full-time remote work in July using a WRC template. However, she admitted at the hearing that she had not formally submitted a written request to her employer regarding changes to her current work arrangement.

The Respondent highlighted that the employment core hours were Monday to Friday, with flexibility for earlier or later starts. Hybrid working policy limited remote work to two days per week. The Complainant’s initial request in October 2022 to work remotely on Wednesdays and Thursdays was approved. In October 2023, she applied to change the arrangement to Thursdays and Fridays, which was also approved and remains her current setup. The Complainant did not submit a formal remote working request to HR or her manager. The Respondent cited issues with the Complainant’s attendance and performance, particularly in adhering to office attendance requirements.

Finding:

The Adjudicator dismissed the matter as the Complainant did not submit a written and signed application for a new remote working arrangement as required under Section 20(3) of the Work Life Balance and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 2023. The application made to the WRC did not meet the legal requirements for a valid request. The Adjudicator emphasised that the WRC's role is to ensure compliance with procedural requirements under the Act, not to assess the merits of remote working applications. Although no finding was made against the employer, concerns were raised about their response, which criticised the Complainant’s performance inappropriately during the hearing. The employer was advised to adopt a clear written policy outlining how flexible and remote working requests are handled under the Act, especially as it also provides rights to parents and carers seeking flexibility. The complaint was found not to be well-founded.

Practical Guidance for Employers:

Employers are advised to:

  • Adopt a Clear Written Policy: Develop a comprehensive written policy on flexible and remote working requests in line with the Work Life Balance and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 2023. Clearly outline the application process, including requirements for written and signed submissions, and identify decision-makers to ensure transparency and compliance.
  • Train Managers: Ensure that line managers are trained on the legal requirements and internal processes for handling remote working and flexibility requests. This helps prevent informal dismissals of requests and ensures compliance with statutory obligations.
  • Respond Appropriately to Complaints: In public forums, such as WRC hearings, avoid commenting on unrelated performance issues unless directly relevant. Focus solely on the matter at hand to maintain professionalism and avoid undermining your position.
  • Communicate Policies and Rights Clearly: Regularly communicate flexible and remote working policies to employees, ensuring they understand their rights and the steps required to make valid requests under the law. This reduces misunderstandings and ensures procedural clarity.

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 04/12/2024
Q&A
Legal Island’s LMS, licensed to you Imagine your staff having 24/7 access to a centralised training platform, tailored to your organisation’s brand and staff training needs, with unlimited users. Learn more →