Background: 
The Complainant argued that the Respondent failed to properly consider her request for remote working in accordance with the Work Life Balance and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 2023 and the associated Code of Practice. She asserted that the Respondent focused solely on its business needs, disregarding her personal circumstances and reasons for the request. Despite raising several concerns about the decision-making process, the Respondent provided limited responses during a follow-up meeting and suggested she file a grievance, which she declined, believing it would be ineffective. The Complainant disputed the Respondent's claim that her request was lawfully handled, asserting that her situation was not objectively or fairly considered. She has brought the case to the Workplace Relations Commission, contending that