This case concerned a claim that the complainants suffered detrimental treatment by the Respondent in the course of their employment. The Court held that complainants must be able to prove a causal connection between the treatment alleged and an act covered by section 74(2) of the Act. As the complainants failed to prove such a link their claim of victimisation failed.
DisclaimerThe information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article.This article is correct at 06/05/2016
Legal Island’s LMS, licensed to youImagine your staff having 24/7 access to a centralised training platform, tailored to your organisation’s brand and staff training needs, with unlimited users.Learn more →
We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more
