Latest in Employment Law>Case Law>Brendan Beirne v Rosderra Irish Meats Group [2023]
Brendan Beirne v Rosderra Irish Meats Group [2023]
Published on: 05/04/2023
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Legal Island
Legal Island
{}
Background

Background:

The Complainant submitted he was discriminatorily dismissed on the grounds of age due to enforced retirement on 18th August 2019.  In June 2019, the Complainant advised his manager that he was seeking to work beyond his 65th birthday.  The Complainant was aware of other employees who had been afforded this facility.  He received a letter from the Respondent’s HR Department on 10th June 2019 referring him to the Works Agreement in relation to retirement age.  Following correspondence between the Respondent and the Complainant’s union official, the company confirmed their position by letter dated 15th August 2019.

The Complainant submitted he had a good record with the Respondent and was fit and healthy and able to perform all his duties.  There was no consultation or negotiation with the Complainant about the matter. The Complainant submitted the Respondent did not adhere to the Code of Practice on Longer Working.

The Complainant is one of a number of former Ruskey Plant employees who transferred to the Jamestown Plant and retained the working conditions of the Ruskey Plant.  These were superior conditions, and the Complainant believed that this was the reason why he was not allowed to continue.

The Respondent’s Code of Practice states that ‘it is good practice of an employer to notify an employee of the intention to retire him/her on the contractual retirement date within 6-12 months of that date’.   The Complainant submitted he received no such notification.  The Request to Work Longer Procedure was not followed.  The Respondent did not provide the Complainant with the ground for the decision or the right to appeal.

The Respondent submitted the Rosderra Meats Group has a long-established normal retirement age of 65 years and they implement a legitimate employment policy which is permitted under employment law legislation.

The Adjudication Officer noted the Respondent provided evidence of a legitimate companywide retirement policy. However, there was no evidence that any explanation of refusal of the Complainant’s request was communicated to the Complainant at any stage.

Accordingly, the Adjudication Officer found that the Complainant was discriminated against on grounds of his age.

Outcome:

The Complainant was discriminated against on the grounds of age and the Respondent was ordered to pay the Complainant the sum of €30,000 in compensation.

Practical Guidelines for Employers:

Employment law prohibits discrimination on grounds of age. Employers are required to objectively justify any retirement age policy that is put in place. Further guidance is set out in the Code of Practice on Longer Working available here. There is an obligation on the employer to present the employee making a request to work longer with the specific objective grounds. The employee should be afforded an opportunity to test these arguments before a final decision is made.

The full case is here:
https://www.workplacerelations.ie/en/cases/2023/march/adj-00027036.html

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 05/04/2023
Legal Island’s LMS, licensed to you Imagine your staff having 24/7 access to a centralised training platform, tailored to your organisation’s brand and staff training needs, with unlimited users. Learn more →