Latest in Employment Law>Case Law>DHL Supply Chain (Ireland) Limited and M.K. Human Resources Limited T/A Temple Recruitment v Monika Martela [2017]
DHL Supply Chain (Ireland) Limited and M.K. Human Resources Limited T/A Temple Recruitment v Monika Martela [2017]
Published on: 02/08/2017
Article Authors The main content of this article was provided by the following authors.
Legal Island
Legal Island
{}
Background

This case involved an allegation by the complainant that she was treated less favourably and dismissed on the grounds of disability. She also claimed that she had been victimised by M.K. Human Resources Limited (the Agency) for previously referring a complaint. The complainant had been on long-term placement with DHL since December 2010 before going on sick leave on the 5th February 2013. She was certified as fit to return to work from the 3rd June 2013 but was not facilitated with a placement in DHL again.

Both respondents claimed that this was due to a reduced demand for agency workers at the time, and that the complainant was not dismissed by the Agency until her resignation in January 2016. She claimed that the fact that she was required to produce 'unusual and specific medical certificates' in advance of being permitted to resume work following her sick leave was sufficient to establish a prima facie case of discrimination. She also claimed that other employees of the Agency, who had been placed at DHL when she was on sick leave, still continued to work there long after she had returned from sick leave. She submitted that she had been effectively dismissed in June 2013 by the failure of the Agency to reassign her to DHL, or any other employer.

DHL submitted that it would not be their practice to specifically request a particular employee to be assigned to them, nor had they the power to replace an existing agency worker in order to accommodate the complainant's return in June 2013. The Agency submitted that the complainant had in fact resigned verbally on the 4th February 2013 but they confirmed that no P45 had been issued to the complainant. They also submitted that there was no vacancy in DHL in June 2013, but that they eventually assigned the complainant to another company in April 2014.

The Court held that the complaint against DHL was not well founded, particularly given the fact they unequivocally indicated their willingness to take the complainant back. However, the Court found that the Agency's position was simply not credible. On one hand the Agency claimed that she had terminated her relationship with them in February 2013 but then required that she produce written confirmation from her doctors that there was no connection between her working conditions in DHL and her illness. Accordingly, the Court found that the complainant had made a prima facie case of discrimination on the disability ground, against the agency, which they had failed to rebut. She was awarded the sum of €20,000 for the effects of the discrimination suffered but her claim of victimisation failed.
http://www.workplacerelations.ie/en/Cases/2017/July/EDA1721.html

Continue reading

We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.

Already a subscriber?

Please log in to view the full article.

What you'll get:

  • Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
  • Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
  • 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
  • Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team

Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial

Disclaimer The information in this article is provided as part of Legal Island's Employment Law Hub. We regret we are not able to respond to requests for specific legal or HR queries and recommend that professional advice is obtained before relying on information supplied anywhere within this article. This article is correct at 02/08/2017
Q&A
Legal Island’s LMS, licensed to you Imagine your staff having 24/7 access to a centralised training platform, tailored to your organisation’s brand and staff training needs, with unlimited users. Learn more →