The claimant and her husband in this case worked for a medical device manufacturer. The claimant's husband suffered an injury at work and was paid full pay for over a year whilst off sick. When the sick pay was removed, the claimant asked for a change of shift so she could drive her husband to work and they could work the same shift.
In order to undertake the new duties the employer required that the claimant re-train. She refused to do so, was granted a cooling off period, took a grievance and was dismissed after many months. The EAT believed her refusal was linked to the withdrawal of her husband's sick pay, which she felt was unreasonable, but that did not justify her refusal to carry out duties:
"The Tribunal is satisfied that while the claimant was entitled to raise a grievance under the Company’s Grievance Procedures she was not entitled to withdraw her Labour or refuse to carry out certain duties while her grievance was being considered. This was not legitimate manner of protest."
http://www.workplacerelations.ie/en/Cases/2013/December/UD1304_2012.html
Continue reading
We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.
Please log in to view the full article.
What you'll get:
- Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
- Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
- 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
- Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team
Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial