The complainant worked as a waiter for the respondent. He made a number of claims to a Rights Commissioner (RC) that the OWT Act was infringed by his employer, some of which were upheld. His claim that he was penalised by his employer contrary to Section 26 of the Act failed, however, and it was that decision which was the subject of this appeal to the Labour Court. The respondent did not attend the appeal hearing and so the case proceeded on the uncontested evidence of the complainant.
The complainant stated that he began work on 10th August 2013 at 11 a.m. and he expected to finish at 11 p.m. that night. He worked alone in the restaurant area
Continue reading
We help hundreds of people like you understand how the latest changes in employment law impact your business.
Please log in to view the full article.
What you'll get:
- Help understand the ramifications of each important case from NI, GB and Europe
- Ensure your organisation's policies and procedures are fully compliant with NI law
- 24/7 access to all the content in the Legal Island Vault for research case law and HR issues
- Receive free preliminary advice on workplace issues from the employment team
Already a subscriber? Log in now or start a free trial