This appeal involved a claim of unfair dismissal. The complainant had been dismissed by her employer on the grounds that she did not have the capability to perform her role as a bus driver. The complainant had a multiplicity of health problems and absences, which combined, led to a multi- factorial conclusion that the complainant was unsuitable to continue working as a bus driver. The company stated that this decision was based on the fact that safety was their number one priority and that they had a duty to protect employees, the general public and the travelling public. The Court heard that this duty was fulfilled by carefully monitoring the 'tolerance' of employees and their capacity to deal with